[HUG ] Re: FW: Cleaning the Mirror
- From: "Richard Sintchak" <rich815@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:54:56 -0800
I see that as a tacit "corporate" reply saying "yes, no problem". After all
if he said yes and it was not the official policy they could fear legal
retribution. That's likely the best yes you'd get!
Richard S.
On 2/18/08, BOB KISS <bobkiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> *DEAR LIST,*
>
> * Not very committal reply but he seems to feel that my method
> will "first do no harm".*
>
> * CHEERS!*
>
> * BOB*
>
> * *
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* ewildi
> *Sent:* Monday, February 18, 2008 1:32 PM
> *To:* BOB KISS
> *Subject:* Re: RE: FW: [HUG ] Cleaning the Mirror
>
>
>
>
> Bob,
>
> Since it seems to work for you, I see no problem with your cleaning
> method. Ernst
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG ] Re: FW: Cleaning the Mirror
- From: Bob Adler
- References:
- [HUG ] FW: Cleaning the Mirror
- From: BOB KISS
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] FW: Cleaning the Mirror
- » [HUG ] Re: FW: Cleaning the Mirror
- » [HUG ] Re: FW: Cleaning the Mirror
- » [HUG ] Re: FW: Cleaning the Mirror
- [HUG ] Re: FW: Cleaning the Mirror
- From: Bob Adler
- [HUG ] FW: Cleaning the Mirror
- From: BOB KISS