[HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: "Richard Schiff" <leicaman@xxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:49:26 -0700
In theory, as technology gets better and better it should be possible to get
the resolving power of an 8X10 into a 24X36 inch detector... the problem is
that optical science has a long way to go to get optics to match the
detectors....
From: Bernard <bernard_cousineau@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:23:51 -0400
New full frame 21mp Canon
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0708/07082009canoneos1dsmarkiii.asp
Their 16MP camera was already pushing most lenses past their limit. I
wonder if this camera will make things worse.
Bernard
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- References:
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Bernard
Other related posts:
- » [HUG] Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
From: Bernard <bernard_cousineau@xxxxxxxx> Reply-To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware! Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:23:51 -0400
New full frame 21mp Canon http://www.dpreview.com/news/0708/07082009canoneos1dsmarkiii.asp
Their 16MP camera was already pushing most lenses past their limit. I wonder if this camera will make things worse.
Bernard =============================================================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Bernard