[HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:14:52 -0700
I keep hearing this, but have never seen the proof..... Can you point out
to me a location where this is proven?
Frank Filippone
red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=
Their 16MP camera was already pushing most lenses past their limit. I wonder
if
this camera will make things worse.
Bernard
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Bernard Cousineau
- References:
- [HUG] Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Bernard
Other related posts:
- » [HUG] Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- » [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Bernard Cousineau
- [HUG] Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Frank Filippone
- [HUG] Re: Digi-Blads Beware!
- From: Bernard