[HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Steve Graff <steve.graff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:42:32 -0700
I agree. Frankly for my money I will stick with the latest in
nanotechnology and store the data at the molecular level using the
full field of view. I can always scan such images to produce 320
Megapixel images with 16 bits per color.
Long Live Film!!
Steve
Jim Brick wrote:
It's the other way around... the Biogon shows the limits of the
Phase One P65 design. The limits of the P65 to accept light at a
steep oblique angle (film does not suffer from this problem).
That's it entirely. Couldn't agree more.
When will the solve the sensor pit vignetting problem? When will
they get rid of the shortcomings of Bayer and other colour patterns?
They have had enough time to think about it. Now's it time to see
some solutions.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to
your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when
you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
Jim Brick wrote:
It's the other way around... the Biogon shows the limits of the Phase One P65 design. The limits of the P65 to accept light at a steep oblique angle (film does not suffer from this problem).
That's it entirely. Couldn't agree more.When will the solve the sensor pit vignetting problem? When will they get rid of the shortcomings of Bayer and other colour patterns? They have had enough time to think about it. Now's it time to see some solutions.
=============================================================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Q.G. de Bakker