[HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: "flexbody" <flexbody@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 04:13:44 +0200
We do not need more pixels we want larger sensors
There is nothing perverted about that wish!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Q.G. de Bakker" <qnu@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:08 PM
Subject: [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
flexbody wrote:
Which brings up the question do we need 50 Mp or even 60 Mp
sensors?
Yes.
I think the mere suggestion that we should not want such thingies is
perverted.
When the technology has problems, we should just settle for less? What!?
I don't think so!
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG ] HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Steve Graff
- References:
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
flexbody wrote:
Which brings up the question do we need 50 Mp or even 60 Mp sensors?
Yes.I think the mere suggestion that we should not want such thingies is perverted.
When the technology has problems, we should just settle for less? What!? I don't think so! =============================================================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- [HUG ] HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Steve Graff
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Q.G. de Bakker