[HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: "flexbody" <flexbody@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 04:08:52 +0200
When will two colour prints made by the same lab by the same man
with the same corrections and a month of time between them ever look the
same?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Q.G. de Bakker" <qnu@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:05 PM
Subject: [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
Jim Brick wrote:
It's the other way around... the Biogon shows the limits of the Phase
One P65 design. The limits of the P65 to accept light at a steep oblique
angle (film does not suffer from this problem).
That's it entirely. Couldn't agree more.
When will the solve the sensor pit vignetting problem? When will they get
rid of the shortcomings of Bayer and other colour patterns?
They have had enough time to think about it. Now's it time to see some
solutions.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
Jim Brick wrote:
It's the other way around... the Biogon shows the limits of the Phase One P65 design. The limits of the P65 to accept light at a steep oblique angle (film does not suffer from this problem).
That's it entirely. Couldn't agree more.When will the solve the sensor pit vignetting problem? When will they get rid of the shortcomings of Bayer and other colour patterns? They have had enough time to think about it. Now's it time to see some solutions.
=============================================================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Mark Rabiner
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: flexbody
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Q.G. de Bakker