[HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: "flexbody" <flexbody@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:26:22 +0200
Which brings up the question do we need 50 Mp or even 60 Mp
sensors?
Most of us are just looking for larger sensors not necessarily
sensors with more pixels.
Up till now I have not heard a complaint about the optical qualities
of the Biogon lens as fitted to the SWC camera.
Nice to know the Phase One P65 will show the limits of the Biogon
design.
It does not bother me at all.......
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 9:39 PM
Subject: [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
WELL!! some guy at the PHASE ONE both at Photokina this week says the
Biogon
does not live up to the modern standards of their new back and everybody
on
the Hassy list sits here going "gee whiz oh well"!
I think its baloney!
We're supposed to apologize for our not retrofocal true wide angle lens?
I guess computer designed retrofocal lens give you higher line pair sets.
I sure could care less!!
I'm interested in the total design of a true wide angle like the Biogon.
I like the lack of distortion which exists on a level retrofocal lenses
don't touch.
And I like the slight tendency of a true wide to darken in the corners.
To me that's a plus.
I like the simplicity and integrity and compactness of the design.
Is PHASE ONE in bed with a lens making concern?
You don't judge a lens but its line pair sets tests.
You judge it on its ability to render images in the real world
and the thousand natural shocks
That image making is heir to ...
mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mark William Rabiner
From: Austin Franklin <austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:27:56 -0400
To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
Hi Frank,
What has been said: There will be AF, and the body
will accept MF ( older ) lenses.
That makes more sense IMO...
Regards,
Austin
==============================================================================
===============================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Austin Franklin
- [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Ulrik Neupert
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- References:
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Mark Rabiner
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
the Hassy list sits here going "gee whiz oh well"! I think its baloney! We're supposed to apologize for our not retrofocal true wide angle lens? I guess computer designed retrofocal lens give you higher line pair sets. I sure could care less!! I'm interested in the total design of a true wide angle like the Biogon. I like the lack of distortion which exists on a level retrofocal lenses don't touch. And I like the slight tendency of a true wide to darken in the corners. To me that's a plus. I like the simplicity and integrity and compactness of the design. Is PHASE ONE in bed with a lens making concern? You don't judge a lens but its line pair sets tests. You judge it on its ability to render images in the real world and the thousand natural shocks That image making is heir to ... mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mark William Rabiner
From: Austin Franklin <austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: "hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:27:56 -0400 To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs Hi Frank,What has been said: There will be AF, and the body will accept MF ( older ) lenses.That makes more sense IMO... Regards, Austin ============================================================================== =============================== To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to youraccount (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Jim Brick
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Austin Franklin
- [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Ulrik Neupert
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Mark Rabiner