[HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: "Franc Flipsen" <fujifan@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:37:12 -0600
Most of the digital backs made today will fit and work on an SWC. I use a
H25(22MP 645 Sensor) Phase One back on my SWC/M with great results, I'm also
using it on my 503CW with the 30mm on it. BTW I paid $2000 for my SWC/M and
$6800 for the H25, I then added a Panasonic Sub-notebook for $700 and can shoot
for 3 hours or 560 images before I need to change batteries or dump images to
my backup drive. I'm not sure about $1000 but $6-7000 would be realistic,
you'll pay $800+ for a film back, $3000+ for a lens so a digital back under $8K
is reasonable (reletive to the cost of Hasselblad gear).
Franc
----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Schiff
To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 1:13 PM
Subject: [HUG ] Biogons and digital backs
Digital or not... the SWC's 38mm Biogon can probably still beat the pants off
any wide angle lens ever made.
I think the there would be a market for a tech start-up to make a Hasselblad
specific Digital back to work with and 500/swc series body. I know the chips
are out there. 5 years ago I held in my hand a CMOS detector that measure 5"
square. It was comprised of four 2.5" CMOS detector plates joined together.
It was a high-gane photographic detector for the Keck telescope in Hawaii. If
that plate was operation 5 years ago then the technology is WAY beyond that
now. producing a 2-1/4 X 2-1/4 full frame detector that could sell for less
than $1,000 should be well within reason today. If Hasselblad or leaf won't do
it then someone should
- References:
- [HUG ] Re: Analogue melt down
- From: steve . graff
- [HUG ] Re: Analogue melt down
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- [HUG ] Re: Analogue melt down
- From: Steve Graff
- [HUG ] Re: Analogue melt down
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- [HUG ] Re: Analogue melt down
- From: Steve Graff
- [HUG ] Analogue melt down - good and bad
- From: Harry Lock
- [HUG ] SV: Analogue melt down - good and bad
- From: Tom Just Olsen
- [HUG ] Biogons and digital backs
- From: Richard Schiff
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs
- [HUG ] Re: Analogue melt down
- From: steve . graff
- [HUG ] Re: Analogue melt down
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- [HUG ] Re: Analogue melt down
- From: Steve Graff
- [HUG ] Re: Analogue melt down
- From: Q.G. de Bakker
- [HUG ] Re: Analogue melt down
- From: Steve Graff
- [HUG ] Analogue melt down - good and bad
- From: Harry Lock
- [HUG ] SV: Analogue melt down - good and bad
- From: Tom Just Olsen
- [HUG ] Biogons and digital backs
- From: Richard Schiff