[HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs

I think the Phase One claim that the Biogon lens will not meet
the possibilties backs with 50 or even 60 Mp give is justified.
Next question is do we need such a superb definition.
Most users are perfectly happy with existing 25 or 33 Mp
backs.
The demand is for larger sensors not higher definition giving
huge files.
Why not go for a larger pixel on a 56x56 sensor with max 33 Mp?
That would satisfy the existing demand.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ulrik Neupert" <ulrik@xxxxxx> 
To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 10:58 PM
Subject: [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs



Dear friends,
I have no personal experience with digital backs. During Photokina I visited the Phase One booth to have a look at recent developments in digital backs. 
They now offer the P65+ back with 60,5 MP and sensor size of 53,9 x  40,4
mm. I expressed my happyness that now a Hasselblad SWC will still be
superwide with this back. They told me that their sensor would not have a
problem with vignetting but that the Biogon would not offer the resolution
to exploit their sensor fully. If this is true or a marketing strategy to
sell their claimed to be superior Phase One camera (Mamiya, i think) i do
not know. But I'd welcome comments on this question.

Ulrik


=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. 




=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: