[HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: "Austin Franklin" <austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:58:28 -0400
Hi Ulrik,
> May I intervene: The Phase One technician said that their sensor
> design has
> no problems with the SWC (light fall-off)
It all depends on what the sensor size is...if it's a significantly reduced
size sensor, well, that's not much of a surprise.
> but that the SWC does
> not deliver
> the resolution to fully exploit the sensor resolution.
That I question.
Regards,
Austin
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Ulrik Neupert
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Ulrik Neupert