[HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:57:26 -0700
That's a flat out lie! There is not a sensor alive, used in any mere
mortal purchasable camera, that has a sensor that can resolve more
than a lens like a Biogon. Absolutely preposterous!
The reason they put low pass filters on sensors is to 'dumb down' the
lens so that the sensor can actually see the fine (in this case, after
dumbed down, not so fine) detail. Think about 5/7/9 micron square
pixel sites PLUS the Bayer pattern and you have HUGE square blotches
representing a pixel. Film is homogenous! Any 'good' camera lens (ANY)
will out resolve any sensor we deal with today. But we have films that
will out resolve some of our best lenses.
The perceived sharpness that you see from a digital image is just
that. Perceived. It is a result of decades of image software engineers
(think NASA, Jet Propulsion Lab, etc.) interpolating (say manipulating
and adding all of the missing data) the available data and CREATING an
eye popping image! Just look at what 'Genuine Fractals' will do with
the puny amount of data from an APC size sensor. Think billboards!
Bottom line, lenses are better than sensors. Film is better than
sensors. It's an engineer sitting in a cube somewhere that is CREATING
the digital images that you get out of your camera and put onto paper.
God bless them for what they do as they are dealing with a flawed
system AND marketing idiots!
Jim
PS... I have a Canon 1Ds Mark III (21MP) and it produces stellar
images. And I thank the Canon image software engineers everyday for
what they can pull out of this camera (a camera that stores electrons
in 7 micron square sites, 196 microns square after factoring in the
Bayer crap).
Jim again
On Sep 30, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Ulrik Neupert wrote:
SWC does not deliver
the resolution to fully exploit the sensor resolution.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Ulrik Neupert
Other related posts:
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- » [HUG ] Re: AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
SWC does not deliver the resolution to fully exploit the sensor resolution.
- [HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs
- From: Ulrik Neupert