[HUG ] AW: Re: Biogons and digital backs

May I intervene: The Phase One technician said that their sensor design has
no problems with the SWC (light fall-off) but that the SWC does not deliver
the resolution to fully exploit the sensor resolution. I had no SWC with me
to proof that statement(only may 50 year old P&S).

Whatsoever, a full-frame back with pixels of the quality that the CFV
delivers would for sure find lots of buyers. A full frame back with the
pixel size of the CV would deliver about 40 MP. 

Ulrik

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:hasselblad-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Q.G. de Bakker
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. September 2008 23:09
An: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [HUG ] Re: Biogons and digital backs

flexbody wrote:

> Which brings up the question do we need 50 Mp or even 60 Mp sensors?

Yes.

I think the mere suggestion that we should not want such thingies is
perverted.
When the technology has problems, we should just settle for less? What!?
I don't think so!



============================================================================================================To
 unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account 
(the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and 
unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: