[hashcash] Re: parallel hashcash proof of concept
- From: Hubert Chan <hubert@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:27:41 -0500
>>>>> "Hubert" == Hubert Chan <hubert@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
Hubert> Running some informal tests, generating a 25-bit stamp in
Hubert> parallel *can* take about the same time as generating a 22-bit
Hubert> stamp with just one process (as would be expected), but
Hubert> sometimes generating the 22-bit stamp is much faster. But my
Hubert> number of runs is far too small so far to say anything
Hubert> meaningful. I suspect that the variance in generation time
Hubert> should decrease too. (It's been a while since I took stats.)
OK, here's the results after 30 runs of each:
22-bit stamp, single process:
avg.: 31.433s (wall clock time)
std. dev.: 38.349
max.: 166.706s
min.: 0.314s
(huge difference between max and min times)
25-bit stamp, 8 parallel processes:
avg.: 31.264s
std. dev.: 20.161
max.: 75.205s
min.: 9.029s
So on a cluster machine, it seems to perform as expected.
--
Hubert Chan <hubert@xxxxxxxxx> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
- References:
- [hashcash] parallel hashcash proof of concept
- From: Hubert Chan
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] parallel hashcash proof of concept
- » [hashcash] Re: parallel hashcash proof of concept
- » [hashcash] Re: parallel hashcash proof of concept
- » [hashcash] Re: parallel hashcash proof of concept
- [hashcash] parallel hashcash proof of concept
- From: Hubert Chan