[hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- From: Hubert Chan <hubert@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 19:45:38 -0500
>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Back <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
Adam> and the non-printables > ascii(127) and whitespace would be banned
Adam> for 7-bit cleanness and mail-transport survivability.
Small clarification: should there be a comma between "non-printables",
and "> ascii(127)"? i.e. the sentence should be parsed as:
the following are banned (in addition to whatever was above):
- non-printables
- > ascii(127)
- whitespace
[...]
Adam> we could put some time limit on acceptance of the version 0 format
Adam> so it doesn't live for ever.
Is the time limit necessary? Not having a time limit only requires
that hashcash verifiers have an extra bit mostly trivial of parsing
code. I don't see that it creates any problems with double-spending
databases, or any other part of the system, unless I'm missing anything.
I'm just asking because if we don't have a time limit, then I can
unblock hashcash from entering Debian testing. I'm fine either way,
though.
--
Hubert Chan <hubert@xxxxxxxxx> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
- Follow-Ups:
- [hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- From: Eric S. Johansson
- [hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- From: Adam Back
- References:
- [hashcash] more format stuff
- From: Adam Back
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] more format stuff
- » [hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- » [hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- » [hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- » [hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- » [hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- » [hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- » [hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- » [hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- [hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- From: Eric S. Johansson
- [hashcash] Re: more format stuff
- From: Adam Back
- [hashcash] more format stuff
- From: Adam Back