[hashcash] Re: [kloecker@kde.org: [Bug 78816] Hashcash support for Kmail]
- From: "Eric S. Johansson" <esj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 09:25:28 -0400
Adam Back wrote:
Any dissent, send it to the bug url:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78816
on one hand, if they are putting in a general-purpose filtering system,
then yes it does not make any sense to add a hashcash specific
extension. If on the other hand, the goal is to make something easily
available and always there, then hashcash specific code should be present.
what's the goal?
---eric
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] [kloecker@kde.org: [Bug 78816] Hashcash support for Kmail]
- » [hashcash] Re: [kloecker@kde.org: [Bug 78816] Hashcash support for Kmail]
- » [hashcash] Re: [kloecker@kde.org: [Bug 78816] Hashcash support for Kmail]
- » [hashcash] Re: [kloecker@kde.org: [Bug 78816] Hashcash support for Kmail]
Any dissent, send it to the bug url:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78816