[hashcash] Re: hashcash BSD vs GNU getopt bug (Re: documentation bug?)
- From: Hubert Chan <hubert@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 19:58:23 -0400
>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Back <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
Adam> Anyway I don't see an obvious way to use the BSD getopt to do what
Adam> hashcash is expecting. But there is another solution, the
Adam> hashcash package already include the source for the GNU getopt
Adam> (for win32 building as it does not have a suitable function), so
Adam> one should just link with that on BSD.
Adam> Any ideas on how to modify Makefile, source or whatever to
Adam> automatically use the GNU getopt source included in the
Adam> distribution on BSD?
Untested, but maybe something like:
#include <ctype.h>
#if !defined __GNU_LIBRARY__
#include "./getopt.h"
#else
#include <getopt.h>
#endif
--
Hubert Chan <hubert@xxxxxxxxx> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
- References:
- [hashcash] documentation bug?
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] hashcash BSD vs GNU getopt bug (Re: documentation bug?)
- From: Adam Back
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] hashcash BSD vs GNU getopt bug (Re: documentation bug?)
- » [hashcash] Re: hashcash BSD vs GNU getopt bug (Re: documentation bug?)
- » [hashcash] Re: hashcash BSD vs GNU getopt bug (Re: documentation bug?)
- » [hashcash] Re: hashcash BSD vs GNU getopt bug (Re: documentation bug?)
- » [hashcash] Re: hashcash BSD vs GNU getopt bug (Re: documentation bug?)
- » [hashcash] Re: hashcash BSD vs GNU getopt bug (Re: documentation bug?)
- [hashcash] documentation bug?
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] hashcash BSD vs GNU getopt bug (Re: documentation bug?)
- From: Adam Back