[hashcash] Re: documentation bug?
- From: Adam Back <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:44:46 -0400
Thanks for the bug reports. I believe a couple of them are
documentation lag. I simplified some of the code, removed some
"helpful" special cases (like omitting -r etc). However it sounds
like there are some issues, which I'll look at one-by-one based on
your problem reports in a bit.
In response to one of your other queries there is currently no support
for file of recipient addresses. However you can stack mulitple
recipients, and use wildcards, regexps etc.
So eg:
hashcash -c -r *@cypherspace.org -r adam.back@xxxxxxxxx
etc
Adam
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:23:55PM -0400, Atom 'Smasher' wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Atom 'Smasher' wrote:
>
> >line 70 of the man page:
> >
> > Minting stamps
> =====================
>
> i tried most of the examples in the man page that specify a resource on
> the command line while minting a stamp... all of them requested manual
> entry of a resource unless "-r" is EXPLICITLY specified.
>
> also, when trying to type in a resource when prompted, there doesn't seem
> to be a way of saying "i'm done"... ^C ^D, etc just cause it to exit,
> without minting any stamps.
>
>
> ...atom
>
> _________________________________________
> PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
> 762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> "All censorships exist to prevent anyone from challenging
> current conceptions and existing institutions. All progress
> is initiated by challenging current conceptions, and executed
> by supplanting existing institutions. Consequently, the first
> condition of progress is the removal of censorships."
> -- George Bernard Shaw
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (FreeBSD)
> Comment: What is this gibberish?
> Comment: http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJBLUnBAAoJEAx/d+cTpVciWJwIALlnv246NNXyhwZy9n4doe8p
> K0IodzhNtnzjQqNXCmxYpzebeJ2bsFZ8ZVLiu+mcTRUHEzsPlBvWpLuol1ES37TZ
> is+lDXYSVmujAdMaVJg2IQPMxAmSVvZOfZ4ZFfVoq+0s1/HgTiyMSd1P+6THCb7c
> 3tHx0taUC813dyaUuYoctpDP8kf0Ccrcei3Bg9n/gKt6ZfuR5IOadSYq2cGge1im
> qH/cY/8NZyflDCXcK+COmIUFYNZFVDnYPFOgbRhjcz+8vHl79sT90mhawTI7KKKF
> LgyfVixEtgh/UWr9ILOnvtDo1IQL+NPQTbSK0bTz9XHc5aGmyHDS+E1ZGQJy6hY=
> =dRBL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- References:
- [hashcash] documentation bug?
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] Re: documentation bug?
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] Re: documentation bug?
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] documentation bug?
- » [hashcash] Re: documentation bug?
- » [hashcash] Re: documentation bug?
- » [hashcash] Re: documentation bug?
- » [hashcash] Re: documentation bug?
- » [hashcash] Re: documentation bug?
- » [hashcash] documentation bug
- [hashcash] documentation bug?
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] Re: documentation bug?
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] Re: documentation bug?
- From: Atom 'Smasher'