[hashcash] Re: Sample code for Dworkian memory-bound POW
- From: "Eric S. Johansson" <esj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 07:47:25 -0400
Anonymous wrote:
> /* mempow.c
> *
> * Memory based proof of work
thank you anonymous. Now we need to figure out if there's any IP
contamination.
proof of work puzzles are all about transistors. The number of
transistors you can use for computation and storage.
Dworkian puzzles can be thought of as hashcash whose storage
requirements exceed the size of today's cache. As soon as you can put
enough memory on to the cache, memory bound POW loses its advantage.
another question is can the MB POW be solved faster if you shrink its
memory requirements and put it into cash (i.e. a spammer cheat)
all in all, it's a problem worth looking at
---eric
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [hashcash] Sample code for Dworkian memory-bound POW
- From: Anonymous
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] Sample code for Dworkian memory-bound POW
- » [hashcash] Re: Sample code for Dworkian memory-bound POW
- » [hashcash] Re: Sample code for Dworkian memory-bound POW
- » [hashcash] Re: Sample code for Dworkian memory-bound POW
- [hashcash] Sample code for Dworkian memory-bound POW
- From: Anonymous