[hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- From: Adam Back <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:18:52 -0500
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 09:36:59AM +0000, Ben Laurie wrote:
> BTW, how about making these lists reply-to the list? (No, I'm not
> interested in having the standard argument - if Adam doesn't want to do
> it, that's fine by me).
Despite my best efforts to kill Reply-To: in the list config, and
asking the list admins for help debugging their web UI, and having the
admin manually configure it underneath the UI, it is still Reply-To:.
What may be confusing things is that some people have
Mail-Followup-To: and at least with mutt this seems to take precedence
over Reply-To:.
(For those wondering what the standard arguments are that Ben mentions
for the against side, see http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html ).
Adam
- References:
- [hashcash] Mutt and hashcash
- From: Kyle Hasselbacher
- [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- From: Ben Laurie
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] Mutt and hashcash
- » [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- » [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- » [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- » [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- » [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- » [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- » [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- » [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- » [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- » [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- » [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- [hashcash] Mutt and hashcash
- From: Kyle Hasselbacher
- [hashcash] Re: Mutt and hashcash
- From: Ben Laurie