[hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- From: Jonathan Morton <chromi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 23:52:34 +0100
When I do 'make 386', I'm getting;
knoppix@ttyp0[hashcash-1.03]$ hashcash -s
collisions = 36800
speed: 368000 collision tests per second
On 'make x86-mmx', I get; speed: 375000 collision tests per second
'make generic' gives me the best performance at 463,000 tests per
second.
Am I missing something?
Are you doing "make clean" in between? If not, almost nothing will get
recompiled with the new settings. The x86-mmx target should get you
about 2.6 million or so.
OTOH, the present method of doing a "quick benchmark" may well be
suspect. I was going to put in a proper one, but haven't got around to
it yet.
--------------------------------------------------------------
from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton
mail: chromi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/
tagline: The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it.
- Follow-Ups:
- [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- From: John Honan
- [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- From: Adam Back
- References:
- [hashcash] Low end benchmarks
- From: Malcolm Howell
- [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- From: John Honan
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] Low end benchmarks
- » [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- » [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- » [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- » [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- » [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- » [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
When I do 'make 386', I'm getting;
knoppix@ttyp0[hashcash-1.03]$ hashcash -s collisions = 36800 speed: 368000 collision tests per second
On 'make x86-mmx', I get; speed: 375000 collision tests per second
'make generic' gives me the best performance at 463,000 tests per second.
Am I missing something?
- [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- From: John Honan
- [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- From: Adam Back
- [hashcash] Low end benchmarks
- From: Malcolm Howell
- [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- From: John Honan