[hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- From: "John Honan" <jhonan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:33:52 -0500 (CDT)
> Following on from the recent posts about minting speed on a 486, here is
> the benchmark output from a Cyrix 5x86 100MHz. Not quite the same thing,
> but back when I had access to a 486/100MHz as well they were almost
> identical in performance so this should be a fair guide:
>
>
> Rate Name (* machine default)
> 32266 ANSI Compact 1-pipe *
> 28576 ANSI Standard 1-pipe
> 25980 ANSI Compact 2-pipe
> 4606 ANSI Standard 2-pipe
> --- PowerPC Altivec Standard 1x4-pipe (Not available on this
> machine)
> Best minter: ANSI Compact 1-pipe (32266 hashes/sec)
Thanks for that Malcolm.
I was trying out some speed tests tonight on a 2GHz P4 running Knoppix 3.6
(boot CD). I was kind of expecting to see better performance.
I'm using the source from
http://www.hashcash.org/source/current/hashcash-1.03/hashcash-1.03pr5.tgz
When I do 'make 386', I'm getting;
knoppix@ttyp0[hashcash-1.03]$ hashcash -s
collisions = 36800
speed: 368000 collision tests per second
On 'make x86-mmx', I get; speed: 375000 collision tests per second
'make generic' gives me the best performance at 463,000 tests per second.
Am I missing something?
- Follow-Ups:
- [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- From: Jonathan Morton
- References:
- [hashcash] Low end benchmarks
- From: Malcolm Howell
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] Low end benchmarks
- » [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- » [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- » [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- » [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- » [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- » [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- [hashcash] Re: Low end benchmarks
- From: Jonathan Morton
- [hashcash] Low end benchmarks
- From: Malcolm Howell