[hashcash] Re: Double Spend Protection
- From: Steve Crook <listpost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:39:31 +0000
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:21:14PM -0500, Adam Back wrote:
> Is this the same problem as the procmail problem?
>
> If so I think the patch will fix, I'll try integrate and make a new
> release this weekend.
>
> Or is this with that patch applied?
Adam,
This is with that patch applied. Hashcash now returns a non-zero code
when the token is invalid, but double-spending is not checked.
- References:
- [hashcash] Double Spend Protection
- From: Steve Crook
- [hashcash] Re: Double Spend Protection
- From: Adam Back
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] Double Spend Protection
- » [hashcash] Re: Double Spend Protection
- » [hashcash] Re: Double Spend Protection
- » [hashcash] Re: Double Spend Protection
- [hashcash] Double Spend Protection
- From: Steve Crook
- [hashcash] Re: Double Spend Protection
- From: Adam Back