[hashcash] Re: 300Mhz amd k6-2
- From: "Eric S. Johansson" <esj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 20:40:26 -0400
Jonathan Morton wrote:
It's actually almost amusing - of all the CPU architectures I've read
the documentation on this week, only the Intel machines seem to be
decoder-starved. Everything else is capable of saturating the integer
and load-store units using ordinary instructions, sometimes several
times over. And that includes the old 68040, another CISC design.
heh this discussion make me wish I still had my old kim-1 (1-mhz 6502) for a trial.
by the way, if anyone is interested, camram 0.3.4 is looking really good. I need to finish up the installer and installation instructions. It can be placed either in front of a mail server (i.e. e-mail stream interception) or within a mail server through procmail. Full capabilities both processing and sending stamps. last thing to check out is to make sure postage to notifications and responses work.
I will be publishing an address here and on the camram list and ask for people to see where the browser based stamp generation fails.
---eric
-- eric
- Follow-Ups:
- [hashcash] Re: 300Mhz amd k6-2
- From: Jonathan Morton
- References:
- [hashcash] 300Mhz amd k6-2
- From: Adam Back
- [hashcash] Re: 300Mhz amd k6-2
- From: Jonathan Morton
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] 300Mhz amd k6-2
- » [hashcash] Re: 300Mhz amd k6-2
- » [hashcash] Re: 300Mhz amd k6-2
- » [hashcash] Re: 300Mhz amd k6-2
- [hashcash] Re: 300Mhz amd k6-2
- From: Jonathan Morton
- [hashcash] 300Mhz amd k6-2
- From: Adam Back
- [hashcash] Re: 300Mhz amd k6-2
- From: Jonathan Morton