[hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
- From: Atom 'Smasher' <atom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:55:14 -0400 (EDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, Justin Guyett wrote:
On 2004-10-01T20:23:27-0400, Atom 'Smasher' wrote:
my default engine (MMX Standard 1x2-pipe) shows the *exact* same speed,
but the estimate for generating a 30 bit stamp has gone up:
30bit 1.09 = 448 seconds
30bit 1.10 = 464 seconds
That's easily within expected variance.
% for ((i=0; $i < 5; i++)); do hashcash -sb30; done
time estimate: 560 seconds (9 minutes)
time estimate: 547 seconds (9 minutes)
time estimate: 498 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 539 seconds (9 minutes)
time estimate: 523 seconds (9 minutes)
==========================
i'm not getting nearly as much variation, in my estimates:
$ for ((i=0; $i < 15; i++)); do hashcash -sb30; done
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 448 seconds (7 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
time estimate: 464 seconds (8 minutes)
...atom
_________________________________________
PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"Anyone who doubts that terrorists could smuggle a
nuclear warhead into New York City should note that
they could always wrap it in a bale of marijuana."
-- Graham Allison, The Boston Globe 27 October 1999
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish?
Comment: http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJBXhiXAAoJEAx/d+cTpVciUyIH/jtY7i20PjTglfhjiVFU0//C
1DvPRoltmA4qiRMp0fsu8T5I4lWaLuIlhqGJ5YTZS6OsT0XhGv95KPz5kseLJyNF
C4PBVSxqFgNvmCmkfOO9PDSxdJQolAHpAnriXKEwx9IfvZe3Fnu4ryu++w2nmeTJ
wEGU4ROT8RPAuz7Bdon7uVmjqLTTPHyZYw98WNEXV6sAE4pJhumLaoTUYc0N6jB8
ALPXsetZwnxsm2D5GoayAfoKjD4iWngutzxNQ/u36B4iEw8uguz0mtWQ1cVc60ok
AAGv3xbsCb5yfNJXObsc07CbbjoKenQ0wajSTg2STAsEslWcCAMNMlimK49g/fY=
=eKJT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Follow-Ups:
- [hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
- From: Adam Back
- References:
- [hashcash] 1.10 benchmark
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
- From: Justin Guyett
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] 1.10 benchmark
- » [hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
- » [hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
- » [hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
my default engine (MMX Standard 1x2-pipe) shows the *exact* same speed,
but the estimate for generating a 30 bit stamp has gone up:
30bit 1.09 = 448 seconds
30bit 1.10 = 464 seconds
That's easily within expected variance.
% for ((i=0; $i < 5; i++)); do hashcash -sb30; done time estimate: 560 seconds (9 minutes) time estimate: 547 seconds (9 minutes) time estimate: 498 seconds (8 minutes) time estimate: 539 seconds (9 minutes) time estimate: 523 seconds (9 minutes)
...atom
- [hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
- From: Adam Back
- [hashcash] 1.10 benchmark
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
- From: Justin Guyett