[hashcash] 1.10 benchmark
- From: Atom 'Smasher' <atom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:23:27 -0400 (EDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
installed on freeBSD 4.9 like a champ.
bench_1.09: C349 5318 1AC5 9F38 5CD9 4295 C8E2 D9D8 F819 8BBE
bench_1.10: 31B1 0207 B5F0 1D27 35C4 0497 79A3 05E3 7B51 7868
upgrading from 1.09 to 1.10 some of the engines got faster and some
slower...?
my default engine (MMX Standard 1x2-pipe) shows the *exact* same speed,
but the estimate for generating a 30 bit stamp has gone up:
30bit 1.09 = 448 seconds
30bit 1.10 = 464 seconds
ok, this is a *trivial* difference, but nonetheless a difference in the
wrong direction.
CPU: AMD Duron(tm) Processor (1194.92-MHz 686-class CPU)
...atom
_________________________________________
PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral
votes to the president [Bush] next year"
-- Walden O'Dell, CEO of Diebold
August 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish?
Comment: http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJBXfUEAAoJEAx/d+cTpVciJSUH/2/rS/6D1t5rhtUqorxYmgOn
7t1OM8dk18yekQR8yDyNjGT/nZRJQORr8LdDfVyc+8C9T6Z25UnSRu0UfxbWj9tA
xCslw09izKWeo3Thnmxdiec2z0cSRDQfPAL0JaViTrDH9csyG9ffQDCNqx4baEAe
JPJTeAnKZazLpWeliJvzCN6fhpL96gDjzVeOw1NNsL11lTKPQtJOAY+1HQwprdXt
rW9UnqxyhX2LMIV5JUwrjteabF8JiHzp48rZycZnoqHFHGAi+YCAKIT2s88EPT9M
uHr79wQMsqYhoGn4jP2W3icgaOlGMjRK21ucoPsyeFSV6qqy4pxkKqhB8lUb+dE=
=a2qF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Rate Name (* machine default)
ANSI Compact 1-pipe
1340177 ANSI Compact 1-pipe
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 5.844
ANSI Standard 1-pipe
1635323 ANSI Standard 1-pipe
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 4.789
ANSI Ultra-Compact 1-pipe
1246832 ANSI Ultra-Compact 1-pipe
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 6.281
ANSI Compact 2-pipe
1561453 ANSI Compact 2-pipe
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 5.016
ANSI Standard 2-pipe
1635323 ANSI Standard 2-pipe
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 4.789
--- PowerPC Altivec Standard 1x4-pipe (Not available on this machine)
--- PowerPC Altivec Compact 2x4-pipe (Not available on this machine)
--- PowerPC Altivec Standard 2x4-pipe (Not available on this machine)
AMD64/x86 MMX Compact 1x2-pipe
2088444 AMD64/x86 MMX Compact 1x2-pipe
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 3.750
AMD64/x86 MMX Standard 1x2-pipe
2299204 AMD64/x86 MMX Standard 1x2-pipe *
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 3.406
Best minter: AMD64/x86 MMX Standard 1x2-pipe (2299204 hashes/sec)
Projected average times to mint:
8 bits: 0.000 seconds (111.3 microseconds)
10 bits: 0.000 seconds (445.4 microseconds)
16 bits: 0.029 seconds
20 bits: 0.456 seconds
22 bits: 1.824 seconds
24 bits: 7.297 seconds
26 bits: 29.188 seconds
28 bits: 116.751 seconds (1.9 minutes)
30 bits: 467.006 seconds (7.8 minutes)
Rate Name (* machine default)
ANSI Compact 1-pipe
1336604 ANSI Compact 1-pipe
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 5.859
ANSI Standard 1-pipe
1640676 ANSI Standard 1-pipe
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 4.773
ANSI Ultra-Compact 1-pipe
1240659 ANSI Ultra-Compact 1-pipe
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 6.312
ANSI Compact 2-pipe
1561453 ANSI Compact 2-pipe
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 5.016
ANSI Standard 2-pipe
1637995 ANSI Standard 2-pipe
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 4.781
--- PowerPC Altivec Standard 1x4-pipe (Not available on this machine)
--- PowerPC Altivec Compact 2x4-pipe (Not available on this machine)
--- PowerPC Altivec Standard 2x4-pipe (Not available on this machine)
AMD64/x86 MMX Compact 1x2-pipe
2084102 AMD64/x86 MMX Compact 1x2-pipe
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 3.758
AMD64/x86 MMX Standard 1x2-pipe
2299204 AMD64/x86 MMX Standard 1x2-pipe *
Solution: 1:22:040404:foo@xxxxxxx::0123456789abcdef:000000Tu1n
Iterations: 7831665
Time taken: 3.406
Best minter: AMD64/x86 MMX Standard 1x2-pipe (2299204 hashes/sec)
Projected average times to mint:
8 bits: 0.000 seconds (111.3 microseconds)
10 bits: 0.000 seconds (445.4 microseconds)
16 bits: 0.029 seconds
20 bits: 0.456 seconds
22 bits: 1.824 seconds
24 bits: 7.297 seconds
26 bits: 29.188 seconds
28 bits: 116.751 seconds (1.9 minutes)
30 bits: 467.006 seconds (7.8 minutes)
464
- Follow-Ups:
- [hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
- From: Justin Guyett
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] 1.10 benchmark
- » [hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
- » [hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
- » [hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
...atom
- [hashcash] Re: 1.10 benchmark
- From: Justin Guyett