[hashcash] 1.03-pr5 => case fix + Jonathan's last patch (Re: Re: considering hashcash)
- From: Adam Back <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 05:57:03 -0400
This is a bug. I am not sure how this did not get noticed before,
because I explicitly made the resources case insensitive by default as
of version 0.31. Well either it never worked or I accidentally broke
it. Anyway I made a very quick fix and put up with latest patch from
Jonathan as 1.03pr5.
(You are and were supposed to use -C to ask for case sensitivity if
you want it, otherwise it should be case insensitive).
http://www.hashcash.org/source/current/hashcash-1.03/
pr5 (or later) should have fix.
Adam
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:37:24AM -0400, Atom 'Smasher' wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> i'm testing this out by piping a message from this list into:
> hashcash -Xc
>
> and i'm getting:
> input text contained:
> X-Hashcash: 0:040824:hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:8f0dda3420326d663f9ed11e
> token check: ok but not fully checked as bits, resource, database
> not specified
>
> exit status 2.
>
> q1) if i specify a resource, it seems to be case sensitive. ???
>
> q2) can there be a "resource file", with a list of addresses that i accept
> mail "To"? or do i have to explicitly test for every address i use to
> receive mail?
>
>
> ...atom
>
> _________________________________________
> PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
> 762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> "Natives who beat drums to drive off evil spirits
> are objects of scorn to smart Americans who blow
> horns to break up traffic jams."
> -- Mary Ellen Kelly
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (FreeBSD)
> Comment: What is this gibberish?
> Comment: http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJBLE/LAAoJEAx/d+cTpVciEJoH/iPofNgpLOl+eMorJiLLdD+h
> JAon8WwUTZjgPdmWOmYd1N40Oc3UB3aFYOzZl+1HVOw/a0Ez/CYKY7wJny6wCHXV
> A2qLjPDF4cjM47yO+Z/H52jLN9Kmtmzh89dFuZkUepn3b97AW3S7oPWzHFenkoru
> kBdQxL83mm2/PJmmlCi9vQcWmnTd3BN0onFnoN90U8Pbl71K/wwdm6sFY2oWsjFk
> u4OKoHnXgRBuCNh2dweolXOpravJ+Dmsn5W57eznbD3VKAuT4soCcAN40LtTyD/E
> PKiXHOVF+5s4TVobSCxLoCgRbJfDN2vkzzE2TkFRSMJCTU4gluibGj1whucu8hk=
> =DddJ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- References:
- [hashcash] considering hashcash
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Eric S. Johansson
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Hubert Chan
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Jonathan Morton
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Hubert Chan
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
Other related posts:
- » [hashcash] 1.03-pr5 => case fix + Jonathan's last patch (Re: Re: considering hashcash)
- [hashcash] considering hashcash
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Eric S. Johansson
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Hubert Chan
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Jonathan Morton
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Atom 'Smasher'
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Hubert Chan
- [hashcash] Re: considering hashcash
- From: Atom 'Smasher'