[openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: "Fredrik Ekdahl" <fredrik.ekdahl@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:45:17 +0100
>> I think this is a problem, as people might want to charge money for a
>> Haiku distribution. And I am not sure if the inclusion of unrar would
>> prevent this (ie. everyone selling a Haiku distribution would need to
>> remove it).
>what about setting up another branch for less-than-ideal software
>licenses? something similar to the --gpl-add-ons, where it could be
>it the repository, easy to enable, and disabled by default
Sounds like a good idea.
Perhaps it could be --free-distro or --non-charge-distro or something like that.
Are there any other parts of Haiku that requires to be free (I mean no
charge..)?
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: Matthijs Hollemans
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- [openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: Matthijs Hollemans