[openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:08:48 +0100 CET
Korli <korli@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >No, we definitely want *built-in* defaults, that's the whole idea
> >behind defaults. I wouldn't mind having additional rules in some
> > system
> >directory, but Expander itself should be useful.
> I don't really understand the idea. Having rules for files when no
> tool
> for expanding is installed isn't very useful.
> The purpose of additional rules is to add them when installing the
> new tool.
I'd agree with you, but since we might want to include unrar in our
distro, I think we can fully support it in the default configuration.
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: Korli
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- [openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: Korli