[openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: "Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:36:59 +0100 CET
"Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> "Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I think we can all agree on adding the necessary rules to
> > > Expander,
> > > and leave the inclusion of the executable to the maker of the
> > > distribution.
> > Do we even have to add the rules to Expander itself? I thought
> > these
> > things were done by the user-defined expander rules in .../config/
> > etc.
>
> Like every good application, Expander should have some decent
> defaults
> when run without settings. Ideally, the settings file should be
> created
> only when your configuration deviates from the defaults.
>
Agreed, but the decent defaults might just as well live in the
B_SYSTEM_ETC directory, for easier upgrades? Although, I guess that
makes the binary dependant on external data which might not be what we
want -- I'm not very involved in the details.
--
Mikael Jansson
http://mikael.jansson.be
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: Axel Dörfler
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- [openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: Axel Dörfler