[openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:02:48 +0100 CET
> Matthijs Hollemans wrote:
> > This is dangerous. If we're not careful, this sets a precedent for
> > adding
> > all kinds of non-MIT (or even worse, non-open source) code to the
> > repository.
>
> MIT or not-MIT is less important as most opensource/freesoftware
> licenses are compatible and btw. allows for commercial use. The
> license
> for unrar looks somewhat like the license for the
> Bitstream-fontcollection (Bitstream Vera Sans Serif, Serif and Sans
> Serif Monospaced)
> Just my opinion. However, some licenses are likely to be void in
> Europe
> and again some other licenses are likely to be void in USA. In
> general
> I'd said _screw the licenses_ and clean out the problems later - if
> need be.
>
IMO, patented stuff should not be used...
software patents sux anyway.
Did I already say that ? oh yeah I did :)
François.
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: Kristian Poul Herkild
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- » [openbeos] Re: unrar
- [openbeos] Re: unrar
- From: Kristian Poul Herkild