"Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Anyway, there is at least one possible problem I am not so happy > about > with your latest changes: > > # ifndef _STDDEF_H /* This is what GCC defines */ > # include_next <stddef.h> > # endif /* _STDDEF_H */ > > That's what BeOS stddef.h header looks like. stddef.h is part of the > GCC distribution, and I think we should use that one as well. > I haven't tried building the tree on other platforms since you made > your changes, but I am pretty sure at least glibc doesn't like them > (and that one alone is worth keeping the BeOS way). Update: at least the part of the glibc that already compiles as part of my tree works with these changes. But I am not sure if we want to replace gcc's stddef.h with our own at all. Adios... Axel.