[openbeos] Re: status of OpenBeOS
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 04:21:14 +0200 CEST
François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> En réponse à Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > I'd go for adding a permissions byte to ports, areas and sems...
> > > just good old Unix semantics, with a umask-like variable
> > > to set default behaviour.
> > > (a correctly implemented umask... R5 implements it in libroot
> > > currently,
> > > so fork doesn't inherit it :^)
> > Nice, didn't know that :-))
> > I hope you can live without this feature for OpenBeOS ;-)
> Hey, how can you pretend to be multiuser and not deal with that ? :P
Hm, BTW shouldn't fork also clone the address space copy-on-write?
Shouldn't then a userland implementation of umask still work?? Am I
missing something?
Adios...
Axel.
Other related posts:
