[openbeos] Re: status of OpenBeOS
- From: François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 00:21:24 +0200 (CEST)
En réponse à Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > I'd go for adding a permissions byte to ports, areas and sems...
> > just good old Unix semantics, with a umask-like variable
> > to set default behaviour.
> > (a correctly implemented umask... R5 implements it in libroot
> > currently,
> > so fork doesn't inherit it :^)
>
> Nice, didn't know that :-))
> I hope you can live without this feature for OpenBeOS ;-)
>
Hey, how can you pretend to be multiuser and not deal with that ? :P
François.
Other related posts:
