"Bruno van Dooren" <bruno_van_dooren@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Also, C++ has better type safety. > i stand corrected. > > what i actually meant was that you should beware of things like > rtti, > exceptions etc... That's right, at least with GCC 2.95. RTTI wouldn't be a big problem, though, because it's very light-weight. Exceptions are not, at least not in the GCC version we are using. > using C++ as C with classes is probably equal to using C and pointers > to > structures. Right, it just has a bunch of extra features you don't want to miss :-) Adios... Axel.