[openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- From: "Waldemar Kornewald" <Waldemar.Kornewald@xxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 18:31:36 +0200
> "Waldemar Kornewald" <Waldemar.Kornewald@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I don't know, if KernelStaticLibrary is the right rule. AFAIK it is
> > > intended for static libs for our kernel, while for the networking
> > > stuff
> > > you will probably want to use BeOS for the time being.
> > >
> > > What you want to your Jamfile is:
> > >
> > > SubDirCcFlags -D_KERNEL_MODE=1 -no-fpic ;
> > > SubDirC++Flags -D_KERNEL_MODE=1 -no-fpic -fno-exceptions -fno-
> > > rtti ;
> > >
> > > The C++ flags disable exceptions and RTTI, if you don't want those.
> > > Unless I missed it, Axel hasn't put his cpp.{cpp,h} to public
> > > locations, so you will have to add also:
> > >
> > > LOCATE_SOURCE += [ FDirName $(OBOS_TOP) src add-ons kernel
> > > file_systems bfs ] ;
> > > SubDirHdrs [ FDirName $(OBOS_TOP) src add-ons kernel file_systems
> > > bfs
> > > ] ;
> > >
> > > And add `cpp.cpp' to your list of sources.
> >
> > Wow! :)
> > Would anyone like to add this to the Jamrules? :)
>
> I've added a rule R5KernelStaticLibrary. It does basically set the
> flags only, so you have to do the latter part anyway (beginning with
> `LOCATE_SOURCE...').
>
> > Which class should I use for lists and maps? Templates? This would
> > make my
> > code very big...
> > Can I use BObjectList, at least? I do not like STL templates. The
> > whole code
> > looks ugly...
>
> I believe, you cannot use the STL in the kernel, for most parts of it
> require a shared library (libstdc++.r4.so). BObjectList cannot be used
> since its base class lives in libbe. So it doesn't look too good
> regarding generic containers.
>
> If you like, I can send you a generic List class (similar to BList, but
> works also with non-pointer type members), a hacked version of
> OpenHashTable from the Tracker sources including some fixes for
> kernelland usage and using areas for storing its data, and a generic
> AVL tree implementation, oh, and a simple doubly linked list. All
> kernel tested.
Thank you very much. That would be very nice.
Waldemar
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- » [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- [openbeos] Re: static libs for drivers
- From: Ingo Weinhold