[openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: "Alexander G. M. Smith" <agmsmith@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:23:28 -0500 EST
Cian Duffy wrote on Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:37:44 +0000:
> power_daemon makes more sense when you consider it does much the same
> job as powernowd in Linux.
That's an anagram for power down. Not good!
- Alex
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Haiku-key
- From: Ronald Vos
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: Cian Duffy
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- [openbeos] Haiku-key
- From: Ronald Vos
- [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: Cian Duffy