[openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: "Nathan Whitehorn" <nathanw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:22:53 -0600 CST
> Heya,
>
> Shouldn't power_daemon really be named power_server as the rest of
> the
> Haiku servers? Daemon is a UNIXy thing, and they usually just append
> "d"
> at the end of the name, i.e., powerd. We'd use power_server.
>
> Or... what's the rationale behind choosing the name "power_daemon",
> Nathan?
I chose _daemon obecause it just sits and looks at things that are
happening, and doesn't really provide services to any other system
components -- it manages them instead. Plus, I'm used to that suffix
from the mail_daemon. If anyone really cares, I'll change it, but it
seems like no one does, judging by the e-mails about plutonium powered
laptops and Austen Powers.
-Nathan
--
Fortune Cookie Says:
"I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've
always worked for me."
-- Hunter S. Thompson
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)
- References:
- [openbeos] power_daemon vs _server.
- From: Mikael Jansson
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)
- [openbeos] power_daemon vs _server.
- From: Mikael Jansson