[openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:28:05 +0100 CET
>
> On 2005-02-24 at 14:16:34 [+0100], Mikael Jansson wrote:
> >
> > Shouldn't power_daemon really be named power_server as the rest of the
> > Haiku servers? Daemon is a UNIXy thing, and they usually just append "d"
> > at the end of the name, i.e., powerd. We'd use power_server.
> >
> > Or... what's the rationale behind choosing the name "power_daemon", Nathan?
>
> Maybe to make the syslog_daemon feel less lonely? ;-)
Besides, "server" has more semantics than daemon...
"power_server" would actually means it brings power to clients...
as in nuclear power plant (yeah, self-powered laptops, 1g of plutonium for life
!)
François.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: Mikael Jansson
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: Mikael Jansson
- [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: Ingo Weinhold