[openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:18:34 +0100
On 2005-02-24 at 14:16:34 [+0100], Mikael Jansson wrote:
>
> Shouldn't power_daemon really be named power_server as the rest of the
> Haiku servers? Daemon is a UNIXy thing, and they usually just append "d"
> at the end of the name, i.e., powerd. We'd use power_server.
>
> Or... what's the rationale behind choosing the name "power_daemon", Nathan?
Maybe to make the syslog_daemon feel less lonely? ;-)
CU, Ingo
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: François Revol
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- » [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- [openbeos] Re: power_daemon vs _server.
- From: François Revol