[openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V7 #140
- From: Lars Hansson <lars-openbeos-misc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:14:46 +0800
Nicholas Blachford wrote:
I believe the reason is cost and possibly also support.
I was told some time ago by someone in the business that the FreeBSD
base took up more room and that meant more Flash ROM, which meant more
$$$ (ROMs use NOR flash which is a lot more expensive than the NAND
flash you find in most flash media cards).
Another possible reason is there is now a lot of support for embedded
Linux, there are specific embedded distros with special kernels etc.
I'm not sure if anything like this exists for FreeBSD.
Actually, there's quite a few routers based on FreeBSD. Juniper's JunOS
is a FreeBSD derivate, some (old?) versions of Nokia's "hardware"
firewalls are running FreeBSD, there's M0n0wall and there are a couple
of Israeli companies (who's names escape me at this moment) that also
makes routers based on FreeBSD. There are more that I cant remember
right now. And that's not counting anything using Net or OpenBSD.
Cisco IOS isn't a FreeBSD derivate though, it's an abomination all of
it's own (well, stolen from Stanford U. but I digress...).
---
Lars Hansson
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V7 #140
- From: Nicholas Blachford
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V7 #140
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V7 #140
I believe the reason is cost and possibly also support.I was told some time ago by someone in the business that the FreeBSD base took up more room and that meant more Flash ROM, which meant more $$$ (ROMs use NOR flash which is a lot more expensive than the NAND flash you find in most flash media cards).
Another possible reason is there is now a lot of support for embedded Linux, there are specific embedded distros with special kernels etc. I'm not sure if anything like this exists for FreeBSD.
- [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V7 #140
- From: Nicholas Blachford