[openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:16:02 +0100 (MET)
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Anyway, we should try to avoid spreading Trash *feature*
> > implementation over
> > several components, don't you think?
> Yep, we should probably move it to libbe and simply let Tracker make
> use of
> it. The only drawback -- if you want to consider it as one -- is that
> other
> applications that would formerly use Tracker scripting thus
> circumvent the
> Tracker Undo/Redo feature. Unless we add a notification mechanism,
> that
> allows the Tracker to get notice.
I don't think that should be needed - since the Trash is an OS wide
feature, one must not think Tracker is responsible for undo/redo then.
Furthermore, there is still the possibility to restore items in the
trash, so that should be enough :-)
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- From: Ryan Leavengood
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- » [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- From: Ryan Leavengood
- [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- From: Ingo Weinhold