[openbeos] Re: on SoftwareValet for OBOS

Because a lot of people don?t know what they're talking about.

Travis

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Vallée
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 8:21 PM
> To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [openbeos] Re: on SoftwareValet for OBOS
> 
> 
> But a question remain. Why so many people flamed Be Inc to 
> include the network stuff (BONE) inside the kernel itself, if 
> that kernel was monolithic anyway ?  I'm a bit confuse here. 
> Someone can put a light on this for me ?
> 
> thanks
> Steve
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Manuel Jesus Petit de Gabriel" <freston@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 7:36 PM
> Subject: [openbeos] Re: on SoftwareValet for OBOS
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > > I'm fully on your side. The most important part in the name 
> > > "OpenBeOS"
> > must
> > > be ... "BeOS".  And I'm not a big fan of Linux too (I hate 
> > > monolithics kernels).
> >
> > This paragraph is not coherent: first praise BeOS for later stating 
> > that
> you
> > hate monolithic kernels. BeOS kernel is a monolithic 
> (thought modular)
> one.
> >
> >
> > manuel,
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
>

Other related posts: