[openbeos] Re: non-present-posix-functions
- From: "Jan Van Hoye" <janvanhoye@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:54:54 +0100 CET
Ok thx, again something I know. Me and my stupid questions ... aiai.
But yeah, who does not ask, will not know ;)
> janvanhoye@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > I port 'date' from NetBSD to OBOS. And I see that 'settimeofday'
> > could not
> > be found. When I look into 'sys/time.h' I see the function
> > 'gettimeofday'
> > and not 'settimeofday'. This is a problem. What I could do is
> > import
> > 'os/kernel/Os.h' and use the function 'set_real_time_clock'. But
> > this
> > makes
> > it non posix compliant.
> >
> > My questions are: What do I have to do if some posix functions are
> > not
> > present in the posix headerfiles of OBOS? Are we going to make OBOS
> > more
> > posix compliant then BeOs and implement those posix functions that
> > are not
> > present. Is there someone that can give me an good explanation of
> > what has
> > to be done when a posix function is not present in a posix header-
> > file?
>
> First of, you're wrong; at least with settimeofday() - that is no
> POSIX
> function, it's a proprietary BSD extension.
>
> Have a look at:
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/toc.htm
> to see what functions are part of POSIX and are sensitive to be added
> into our repository (if they are missing).
>
> Although we are okay supporting some BSD extensions, I don't think
> settimeofday() should be one of those. So I'd say either use the GNU
> date as Be did, or port it over to be Be native (and lose simple
> updates that way).
> Since these applications aren't changed that often anymore, I don't
> care about a particular way between these two. Using GNU date might
> be
> less effort, though.
>
> Bye,
> Axel.
>
>
>
>
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: non-present-posix-functions
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] non-present-posix-functions
- » [openbeos] Re: non-present-posix-functions
- » [openbeos] Re: non-present-posix-functions
- » [openbeos] Re: non-present-posix-functions
- » [openbeos] Re: non-present-posix-functions
- [openbeos] Re: non-present-posix-functions
- From: Axel Dörfler