[openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- From: "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:27:14 +0100 CET
> "Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > After R1, I want to introduce file system layers, so that we can
> > > just
> > > plug in generic attribute support for all file systems that don't
> > > support them natively. That should also simplify a couple of
> > > things
> > > :)
> > Like .DS_Store and such used in MacOS X?
>
> How it's realized should be configurable. Personally, I'd prefer to
> store those files locally by default, like Marco's cdda-fs does -
> that
> way, you won't clobber other file systems for no reason, and also
> provide this service to read-only volumes.
The read-only volume support is questionnable though, are they really
read-only then ?
Now, things like the EA DATA file on FAT must be handled by dosfs
itself, not an upper layer unfortunately, since that very file is
actually just a fake file to make sure the clusters won't be reclaimed
by scandisk, but the dirents actually have a pointer to the cluster
that contains the eas for its node.
So much for broken designs :)
François.
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- [openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- From: Axel Dörfler