[openbeos] Re: kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:14:05 +0100 (MET)
"Jackson, Anthony" <ajackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That does raise an interesting point. At the moment everyone is
> focused
> on getting to R5 compatibility without adding any twiddly bits along
> the
> way, so Haiku remains streamlined. But once you're into
> post-R1/glass-elevator territory where everyone has nice ideas for
> little add-ons and other feature creep, what then stops Haiku falling
> into the pit of bloatware?
That will always depend on who is maintaining Haiku. The current team
would certainly not accept patches that go in such a direction. And I
don't expect the current team to dissolve after R1 is done :-)
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- From: Jackson, Anthony
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- » [openbeos] Re: kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- [openbeos] Re: kernel devs: creating a good wheel
- From: Jackson, Anthony