I believe devs link to libm in their programs for a reason ( else,
why put in -lm if not needed?? ) and removing the linking to libm is
not the right way to do it. Could cause issues. That we should
link to libroot instead when a program wants libm.
Can someone clear this up because maybe I am confused? If a POSIX
program is looking for libm should we:
a) just remove -lm ( not link to libm ) or
b) change -lm to -lroot ( to link to libroot instead of libm )
From what I can tell, Scott is doing a) and I believe it should be
b). If a), then can someone also explain why a program would use -
lm if it is not needed.
