[openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:04:15 CEST (+0200)
"Philippe Houdoin" <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mat wrote:
> > Remember, the GCC ABI issues affects GCC C++ only.
> Hum, no!
> Unfortunatly, it's worst that that.
>
> For example, even in gcc 2.95.3 there is some really slim changes in
> the
> symbols names mangling schema from the BeOS builtin, which can broke
> even C only code.
I guess that's only a problem of that port, and should be easily
fixable.
Adios...
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- From: Philippe Houdoin
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- » [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI
- From: Philippe Houdoin