[openbeos] Re: driver interface question
- From: "Vassilis Perantzakis" <vaspervnp@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:01:27 +0300
Bruno, a question out of subject? Are you still working on a Nvidia
driver? If so how is it moving along?
Vassilis Perantzakis
The BeOSMax Team.
-----Original Message-----
From: openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruno van Dooren
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 2:13 PM
To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [openbeos] driver interface question
for some time now i have been wondering why the declaration of the
driver
interface posix calls (open, close, ioctl, ...) are split over 3 header
files? (i don't know by heart which 3, and i don't have a BeOS system
nearby
at this moment)
wouldn't it make much more sense to have all those calls combined in 1
header file?
not to mention the fact that the BeBook does not contain information on
how
to actually call and use device drivers.
i learned it by going through the examples a year ago, but still...
of course i don't know very much about posix, so my question could be a
little silly, but does anyone know the 'why' of this?
kind regards,
Bruno.
_________________________________________________________________
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: driver interface question
- From: Bruno van Dooren
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] driver interface question
- » [openbeos] Re: driver interface question
- » [openbeos] Re: driver interface question
- » [openbeos] Re: driver interface question
- » [openbeos] Re: driver interface question
- [openbeos] Re: driver interface question
- From: Bruno van Dooren