[openbeos] Re: driver interface question
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:51:36 +0200 CEST
"Bruno van Dooren" <bruno_van_dooren@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> for some time now i have been wondering why the declaration of the
> driver
> interface posix calls (open, close, ioctl, ...) are split over 3
> header
> files? (i don't know by heart which 3, and i don't have a BeOS system
> nearby
> at this moment)
The driver interface is in just one header, called <Drivers.h>.
OTOH the corresponding Posix calls are spread over several headers as
the standard requires. Every function/structure has a prescribed home
with Posix.
> not to mention the fact that the BeBook does not contain information
> on how
> to actually call and use device drivers.
There is a list of some official driver ioctl()s in the drivers
section.
> i learned it by going through the examples a year ago, but still...
>
> of course i don't know very much about posix, so my question could be
> a
> little silly, but does anyone know the 'why' of this?
Because that part just isn't BeOS specific, but general programming -
devices are files, and files can be opened; the only way to alter such
a file is using ioctl(); that's really standard behaviour, and I guess
that's the reason why it has been left out of the BeBook, just as
proper network documentation.
I would also guess that you'd know what you do when accessing drivers
directly.
Adios...
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeos] driver interface question
- From: Bruno van Dooren
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] driver interface question
- » [openbeos] Re: driver interface question
- » [openbeos] Re: driver interface question
- » [openbeos] Re: driver interface question
- » [openbeos] Re: driver interface question
- [openbeos] driver interface question
- From: Bruno van Dooren