[openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- From: "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:59:59 +0100 CET
> "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
> > > Personally I wouldn't mind if the *index utilities were
> > > combined into one, to reduce clutter.
> >
> > Hm - at least mkindex and lsindex are far enough
> > from each other to justify different commands.
>
> I realize it would break a few scripts, but if it was up to me,
> I'd combine all of the *index commands into one.
> Same with the *attr commands.
>
> There are enough /bin entries as it is, and it'll only get worse.
>
> Anyway, cpindexes could definitely be part of mkindex,
> perhaps like this:
>
> mkindex --copy /source /target
In Unix often commands have several names, which are (sym)linked to the
main binary. Like zipinfo -> unzip, and gunzip -> gzip.
The command checks argv[0] on startup to switch functionality.
See src/apps/bin/trash, it can be symlinked to untrash.
Makes less binaries (but not less entries :)
>[...]
B_TEXT_TOO_LONG :p
François.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- From: Jonas Sundström
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- From: Jonas Sundström
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- » [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- From: Jonas Sundström
- [openbeos] Re: clipboard, etc
- From: Jonas Sundström